Funding
Testing

James Grissom
HIV Positive
Steve Sherman
Coordinator, NC AIDS Drug Assistance Program
Peter Leone, M.D.
Medical Director, HIV/STD Prevention & Care Branch
Fred Wiggins
HIV Positive
Milford Evans
Benefits Advocate
Bart Haynes, M.D.
Director, Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology, part of the National Institutes of Health

Acute HIV Testing
AIDS Funding
AIDS Research
AIDS Volunteers

Click here for to view more video online, to download podcasts and view more educational resources.
Viewing video requires a REAL player. Click here to download a free REAL player.
|
|
Interview:
Steve Sherman
Coordinator, NC AIDS Drug Assistance Program
North Carolina's AIDS Drug Assistance Program currently serves about four thousand people, yet there are many more who need help paying for their medications. Why isn't there enough money?
Play Video: LOW Speed - HIGH Speed
The dollars that we receive to serve folks through the AIDS Drug Assistance Program come from federal dollars, through the Ryan White program, they come from state appropriations, and we also receive some rebate money from drug manufacturers. When you put all that together, it gives us a fixed amount that we have during the course of the year to serve people.
Unfortunately the amount of money we have doesn't go as far as it needs to go in terms of being able to serve everybody who qualifies for the program and needs the services.
When we reach the maximum amount we believe we can serve for the full year based on the number of people who actually use the program, we are forced, really, to start putting people on a waiting list. The last thing we want to do is enroll somebody in the program, bring them in and start serving them, and then somewhere down the road during the course of that year get into a situation where we find we don't have enough money to serve the people who we are serving.
A waiting list has been with North Carolina, unfortunately, on and off since the end of 1997 and, unfortunately, mostly on.
There are other funding needs as well - for example, prevention. How do you prioritize?
Play Video: LOW Speed - HIGH Speed
It's a very difficult question to say which is the number one priority. I think clearly when you have people who are ill and you have some means to be able to help them improve or maintain their health status, which contributes in lots of ways, it's certainly an extraordinarily high priority. I think the other very important aspect, however, is that given the fact that we don't have a vaccine, given the fact that we don't have a cure, that prevention is also extraordinarily important because unless we all collectively, nationally and internationally, do a better job at prevention, then we're simply going to have more and more people who are infected who will need more and more dollars in the AIDS Drug Assistance Program and in the care arena to serve them. To differentiate and say ADAP is a higher priority than preventing the further spread of the disease is a very difficult decision, and I think different people feel differently. I think that we need to take care of people who are ill and who are low income, and when we know what it is and we have a resource - the drugs - that will help make a difference in their lives and maintain their lives, yeah, I think that's about as high priority as you can get, but we better do something in prevention also or we're just going to get further and further behind.
People who are on medications, take their medications regularly, who have their viral load controlled, relatively, to the point where it's undetectable or at least very low, quite frankly are less likely to transmit the disease to other individuals. A lower viral load usually means less transmission, less transmissibility. And so keeping people on AIDS drugs, getting them on in the first place and keeping them on, is not only important for their own health status and their own well-being, but it's also a prevention strategy. And it's an important one, because the only people who can transmit HIV is someone who is HIV positive. |