 |
1996-1997
Broadcast Seasons
Improving
Student Achievement Pt 2
April
25, 1997
An overview
of many related issues are presented to improve the disproportionately
below average performance of minority and at-risk students
in NC.
Improving
Minority and At-Risk Student Achievement:
Blueprint for Excellence
Introduction
This
Blueprint provides a series of phases that can be used by
individuals or groups, to develop a plan of action for improving
the performance of minority and at-risk students. The conventional
wisdom is that the most successful efforts for improving student
performance will involve multiple organizations, interests,
and perspectives. Such involvement will help ensure ownership
of the solutions and outcomes and provide access to available
resources. It is important to be sensitive to the needs of
all involved groups. Blueprint activities should not give
the impression that one group or another is somehow to blame,
or that the problems belong only to one group. The expectation
is that the performance of all students will improve in meaningful
ways as result of these efforts.
The
initiator(s) of the Blueprint in each community may vary according
to local needs and interests. In some communities the local
school system may initiate the Blueprint, in other communities
business or civic leaders may take the lead. It is most important
that communities take responsibility and initiate steps to
establish a plan of action and strategies for improving student
performance. This process will integrate a wide variety of
information and data about students, existing programs and
services, and key community resource persons. The data recommended
for use in the Blueprint are not intended to be exhaustive,
e.g., other data relevant to individual schools and the school
system should also be included. The Blueprint is predicated
upon the following Principles:
Principles
for Excellence
- Involve
a wide range of constituencies as equal decision-making
partners
- Make
data driven and/or research based decisions
- Use
a systemic approach to plan, implement, monitor and modify
programs
- Develop
a collaborative mission, belief system, and vision
- Allocate
resources needed to cause change such as people, money,
materials, time, space
- Schedule
adequate time for team members to meet and successfully
complete tasks
- Provide
an opportunity for all constituencies to have input on decisions
- Monitor
progress towards your organization's mission and goal accomplishment
- Encourage,
recognize and verify participant groups and individuals
- Provide
a free flow of information to all stakeholders in the school/community
- Empower
administrators to provide quality leadership for collaborative
reform
- Develop
skillful leadership teams to guide the improvement process
Definitions
Minority:
A racial, religious, political, national, or other group (such
as disabled persons) regarded as different from the larger
group of which it is part.
At-Risk
Students: A term liberally used to describe students who are
at-risk of academic failure. These students may be performing
below expected levels of proficiency; may be engaged in disruptive
or non-productive behaviors such as absenteeism, violence,
drug/alcohol use; and may come from families that have been
identified as low income or low socio-economic status.
Blueprint
for Excellence
- PHASE
1: The Initiation: Build Core Support
Improving
student performance is a significant challenge and requires
preparation and the involvement of all stakeholders in the
community. The primary goal is to develop a strong and influential
core of concerned individuals who share a vision of what
needs to be done and who are willing to help do it.
- A.
Conduct an honest and non-judgmental assessment of student
performance.
-
Identify the possible reasons why students are experiencing
low performance in your school and school system
-
. What are the contributing factors?
-
Which of these factors do you have control over? Remember
that we cannot control students socioeconomic status,
gender, or ethnicity. Collected data should include descriptions
of both controllable factors and indicators of minority
status or at-riskness.
-
What can be done to eliminate or reduce the influence
of these controllable
factors on student performance?
-
Review disaggregated data for elementary, middle, and
high schools by gender, ethnicity, and other factors in
addition to comparisons of the average student performance
- B.
Identify resource individuals and organizations in the community.
Consider involving:
-
Persons well known in the target community or population
-
Persons who are knowledgeable about the history and
development of the community
-
Parents and family members
-
Persons who are oriented to conceptualization and/or
action
-
Experienced persons with a variety of talents and resources
and a record of perseverance in addressing community
problems
-
Persons with civic and organizational identification
-
Persons who are on the receiving end of the problem
-
Youth leaders and high school students
-
School personnel
-
People in the business community
-
Church leaders (Ministers, directors of religious education)
-
C. Contact members of the key constituencies and enlist
their support.
-
D. Determine their perceptions of the problem, the resources
they are willing to contribute to help improve student performance,
their preferences for action, and the role they are willing
to assume in the process.
-
E. Hold a first meeting with the core support group
and discuss roles and responsibilities. Agree on a beginning
strategy to involve the appropriate people. Keep a record
of the people you have contacted, their perceptions of the
problem, and their suggestions for action. The number of
persons in the core group will vary according to the number
of essential stakeholders in each community.
-
PHASE 2: Develop Ideas and Specific Strategies Decide
who will be participants and collaborators in the improvement
process. Think! Talk! Listen! Ask questions. Discuss the
obstacles or barriers faced by the community that will impede
success. Be candid.
-
A. Decide who has important information and should be
contacted.
-
B. Define specific questions that are related to improving
student performance and how to solve them--the what, why,
when, and how questions.
-
C. Your goal is not to reinvent the wheel but create
a better performing wheel.
-
What has already been done to address low student performance
in your community; avoid strategies that may or may
not have met with success in the past
-
Make an initial assessment of available resources
-
Ask individuals and groups what they are willing to
do to help
-
Discuss action strategies
-
PHASE 3: Build Community Interest and Support for Improving
Student Performance
- A.
Build community interest through contact with organizations
and influential individuals. Offer to present your ideas
at meetings of community groups.
B. Develop contacts with the media.
-
PHASE 4: Reach Consensus on a Plan of Action
-
A. Be inclusive. Include the people you have contacted
and that have been involved in previous meetings and discussion
groups.
B. Let group members give their perceptions of the most
pressing problems and causes.
C. Reach an agreement on the problems or contributing
factors for low student performance that should be addressed
first.
D. Discuss the kinds of feasible, visible, and effective
actions that would help eliminate the problems or contributing
factors that have been identified.
E. Agree on a preliminary action or strategy.
-
PHASE 5: Develop the Blueprint for Excellence.The Blueprint
should include a:
- Mission
Statement
- Goals
Statement
- Description
of Essential Tasks
Suggested Tasks
-
1. Review school system and school policies, procedures,
practices, curriculum guides, lesson plans, instructional
materials, etc. to be sure they are free of bias or that
they do not negatively affect any racial, ethnic, gender,
religion, cultural, or disabled group. For example, this
review may reveal policies that essentially discourage,
although unintentionally, minority and at-risk students
from enrolling in more academically challenging courses
such as higher level mathematics and sciences
2. Analyze all student outcome data for your school
district and school (test scores for the past three years
in every subject; other factors such as student attendance
data; dropout data; number of hours students watch television/play
video games; number of
hours students spend doing homework; number of hours students
spend working; number of students suspended/expelled;
number of students in academically gifted programs; number
of students in exceptional children programs; ratio of
students per teacher; number of students in Achievement
Levels I, II, III, and IV; number of students proficient
in the five core high school courses; number of students
taking the Scholastic Achievement Test and how well they
ve done; number of students who have passed the North
Carolina Competency Tests in Reading and Mathematics;
number of students enrolled in alternative programs
3. How many students are performing at Level I or
II or below proficiency levels for high school courses?
4. Disaggregate the above data ( 2 and 3) by gender
, ethnicity, and other factors
5. Meet with teachers, principals, curriculum coordinators,
parents to candidly discuss the data and other information.
Form a school-wide committee that is representative to
address the Blueprint for Excellence
6. Contact school system curriculum coordinators
for ideas and assistance. Involve them.
7. Use faculty who are knowledgeable about teaching
minority and at-risk students to train others or teach
their classes
-
D. Timeline
-
E. Evaluation Plan (Evaluation may be conducted by the
core group or an independent group according to available
resources; evaluations should be formally tied to improvement
objectives and goal.)
- PHASE
6: Inform and Educate the Larger Community About Your
Plan
-
A. Establish a beginning date.
B.
Build a strong, documented case for the need and for the
probable success of the effort to improve student performance.
-
Continue to solicit resources and generate support for
the programs
-
Use local media and develop a plan for communicating
with the public
- PHASE
7: Implement the Blueprint for Excellence
-
A. Use sound techniques to assure the continuing interest
and commitment of key people.
B. Maintain an action focus.
- PHASE
8: Evaluate and Improve Your Blueprint for Excellence
-
A. Identify program objectives you plan to evaluate.
B. Decide how you will ascertain the amount of progress
made toward each of your objectives.
C. Collect information about the progress of the
Blueprint Initiative.
D. Summarize and publicize the results for potential
funders, media, community reports, etc.
Blueprint
developed by Dr. Cassandra Atkinson and incorporated Bain,
J.G. and Herman, J. L., (1989) Improving opportunities for
underachieving minority students: A planning guide for community
action. Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and
Student Testing UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Los
Angeles: CA.
|