|
Diversity
on College Campuses
Episode 1209
| Holloway: |
Jay
Holloway (Host) |
| Deifel: |
Tony
Deifel |
|
Johnson: |
Michelle Johnson |
Holloway:
Segregation, hate crimes, prejudice and other forms of racism,
they may exist on colleges campuses across our state and across
our country. We'll tackle this issue and others next on Black
Issues Forum.
[MUSIC]
Holloway:
Good evening, I'm your host, Jay Holloway. Tonight we're addressing
the problem of race relations on college campuses and ways
institutions of higher learning can better approach the problem.
To discuss this issue, we have with us Tony Deifel, he's Executive
Director of the Institute for Public Media Arts and the Ism
Project; and Michelle Johnson, she's with North Carolina Public
Allies, and she's also with Youth Voice Radio. Thank you both
for being with us today to discuss this
Deifel:
It's great to be here.
Holloway:
Thank you for being here. And before we get into that though,
to begin our discussion on diversity, let's start with that
part of it, let's first listen to what Dr. Michael Eric Dyson,
author of Race Rules: Navigating the Color Line, had to say
about college and diversity as a panelist on a multi-media
diversity teleconference. Here it is.
Dyson:
[RECORDED COMMENT] . . . so that when I tell kids, if you
go to college, and you know, people warn you, "when you go
there, don't change, don't be a sellout." I tell my son, "if
you to college and you ain't changing, you wasting your time
and my money!" You've got to change, and so you're going to
talk to somebody who looks different than you, you've got
to interact with somebody who's going to challenge your assumption,
who's going to tell you that it's not about black and white,
i
Female:
[RECORDED COMMENT] That's great. I wanted to move onto the
next question from John Okamura, at . . . .
Holloway:
Well, that's, Michael Dyson is not stranger to North Carolina
or the UNC system schools. Actually, that was in our studio
as a part of the Ism Project, part of your project, where
you dealt with over 10,000 college students and several different
colleges and universities nationwide and some in North Carolina.
Let me get your reaction to the comment he just made about,
I guess, coming to college with an open mind and not coming
to just support your views that you already have about
Deifel:
I actually would like to reflect on a recent experience I
had last week. I went to Harvard Business School just to visit
a class to check it out, and I was struck that over 50% of
the student body at Harvard Business School in graduate school
is international. And when I sat in the class, they do case
study method, and they got people to argue with each other,
and people would bring in their backgrounds, and one guy was
Filipino and that was his experience, and they really start
arguing and it became a diversity discussion really, and they
kind of see that as, that's the way to teach the future kind
of leaders of America, through business. And I think that's
exactly why Affirmative Action is important on college campuses,
is to bring that difference, because only with that dissonance
can learning really happen.
Holloway:
So you think that kind of dissonance and arguing is really
going to bring about some learning, because your differences
are right on the table and it's very clear where you stand.
Deifel:
Yeah, if somebody doesn't step on your toes, you're going
to stay in the same place the rest of your life, you know?
Holloway:
So Michelle, what do you think about that?
Johnson:
I think that Dr. Dyson definitely has a point, that one should
use a higher education opportunity to expose oneself to culture's
all over the world, as well as the ones that are available
right within your own back yard. However, I also think it's
important for students to come to campus and find a place
where they feel comfortable at least part of the time. I think
that is the reason why women's centers should be an option
for students on campuses, why black cultural centers, why
Holloway:
Well how do you deal with this opportunity to come in and
affirm yourself and be with people like you, while also an
opportunity to deal with this distance and this discussion
of two different viewpoints, so that you can learn.
Johnson:
By being a complex person.
Holloway:
[laughs]
Johnson:
I mean, that's . . .
Deifel:
You're just not one identity, you're like many identities
and so, yeah.
Holloway:
Well we are complex people. Why do we still have these problems
with race relations?
Deifel:
Because it's threatening, because it's difficult stuff. I
mean one of the things that's hard about, I mean, we're sitting
here talking on TV, but yet TV doesn't allow for us to really
show the struggle, the difficulty and the darkness, really,
around, look at yourself, because whenever you're dealing
with people who are different than you, really what you're
doing is reexamining yourself, and that's hard to do. And
that's really hard to do, I think, you know, when people are
watchin
Johnson:
I'm not too sure if I understand your first comment about
television being . . . I missed that. You're saying television
. . .
Holloway:
Good question, I was going to ask that.
Deifel:
Well I think one of the things is that we're sitting here
on television, you know, and to what degree might we be a
little bit more guarded in talking about some of these issues-and
I'll just tell you with me. To what degree would I be more
guarded because it's television and it's going out there,
and I can't engage with the viewer in a relationship that
would allow for me to understand where they're coming from,
and them to understand where I'm coming from, because it's
just like weng about it. So I think it's harder to get into
some of the difficulties.
Holloway:
One of the things that John Hope Franklin, who's right here
in this state, says, that of course, what we need is more
dialogue amongst different races that's open and honest and
meaningful. And that's one of the things we wanted to get
at least with you today. At least we have different races
. . . . Your background in this Ism Project, you actually
had people to get an opportunity through videotape to actually
bring some of these things out to light. Can you share what
some of the things that came out of that project? And it was
part of that discussion we just saw with Michael Dyson. What
were some of the findings that came out of that?
Deifel:
I'll tell you a couple things, but Michelle also is in one
of the classes at UNC-Chapel Hill. We've worked with 19 colleges
and universities, over 60 faculty members and over 350 students
in a class model that we have. And the class model's really
simple: all it is is that students make video diaries articulating
their point of view on the world, related to the communities,
their sense of identity, and they complete power to do whatever
they want with that. And then in the next part of the class,
they have to form relationships with people across lines of
difference and collaborate and compromise and negotiate to
make a video together, which, what happens there, people engage
difference, they engage risk, intention, and all the kind
of stuff. And to hook that into a learning experience, how
to then, you think about these issues in a different way.
So it's not just simply watching videos, but it's actually,
you know, how do you engage in relationships around this stuff
that really challenges how people see the world?
Holloway:
What did you learn? You were in the first Ism Class Project,
what did you learn with the negotiation and the relationship
issues?
Johnson:
Well, I think each student would have learned something different.
One of the things I was sharing with Tony on the way over
here today is that I participated in the Isms project when
I was a senior, and it was the spring semester of my senior
year, so I wasn't focused on a lot of things! And the things
I was focused on probably weren't going to help me graduate!
But in general, one of the things that I learned, which was
very important: eventually, the group that I joined to makarance
or to have people make comments or touch you suggestively.
And I went to the club, and I was just sort of like, "well,
I got the night off!" [laughs]
Holloway:
Well, let me ask you, why is it often-Tony and I were talking
about this off-camera before the show-why is it often that
when you bring up the race relations discussion that both
older adults, and I guess in this case, youth or college students
quickly move the discussion to other diversity issues, and
sometimes away from the issues and discussion of race?
Johnson:
I'm not too much what you're saying, Mr. Holloway!
Holloway:
You just did that!
Johnson:
Oh, I was just bringing . . .
Holloway:
As an example.
Johnson:
I was bringing to you how I was going to deal with the community
that I hadn't really thought about before I entered. And I
mean, I think within the United States, being a citizen of
the world, that there is no way that you can look at issues
of diversity in black or white; that we are no longer, we
no longer have the privilege or the opportunity . . .
Deifel:
Or with just race.
Johnson:
Yeah. To just think about race. I mean, we have to band together,
in my opinion, especially as a person of color, with people
who are oppressed across the world, across a wide variety
of issues. I mean, we have to form coalitions of poor people,
of working class people, of people of color, of gay, lesbian
and bisexual and transgender people. Our communities are so
small in and of themselves that without coalition, we can't
accomplish anything, or we can't transform.
Holloway:
Tony, have you noticed that often these discussions in general
are brought about mostly by those that are in the minority
on these types of discussions, as opposed to the majority?
Deifel:
Well, being a white man, I'm very aware of my privilege to
not have to talk about these issues, and I can find ways of
being in certain communities or working in certain ways where
it just doesn't come up as an issue. So I try to take an effort
to do that, but I think that does happen, I mean, I think
if you're from a subordinate group, is what academicians would
call it, you're very aware of the other, and because of that,
you think about it more regularly, it meets your interest
in
Holloway:
And you acknowledge that that's a minority view within your
culture.
Deifel:
Yeah. I mean, it's hard for people with, I think, the more
privileged you are, the harder it is to identify and recognize
how you're privileged. I'm very aware of that.
Johnson:
To follow up to Tony, and my personal experience, I think
I've found people who are oppressed to be actually less likely
to look at oppression across boundaries. That, you know, I
have participated in joint meetings of the Black Student Movement
at UNC-Chapel Hill and BGLAD, which is Bisexual, Gays, Lesbians
and Allies for Diversity, and have seen the two groups basically
like, "what are you talking about? We are the oppressed!"
That you know, when oppressed peoples get together,
Deifel:
It's called hierarchy of oppression.
Johnson:
"I'm more oppressed than you!" "No, I was more oppressed!"
"My people have been for 400 years!" "My people-the Holocaust-the
this, the that!" You know, so I'm not seeing, when I'm interacting
with people, coalition building, this openness, this understanding
of the commonalties of oppression. What I see most often is
again, the hierarchy of oppression.
Deifel:
One of the things I think happens around differences, when
you engage difference, your first reaction when you come from
a place of privilege, whether it's gender or race or whatever,
you say, "I've never thought of that before." It's not even
just privilege. I think anytime you interact with anybody
who's different than you, it's like, "I've never thought about
that before," and then the next step is, "I've never had to
think about that before." And that crosses a line, it's like,
Johnson:
Ageism.
Deifel:
Ageism, just tons of stuff. And while it's powerful to find
connections between all of those, at the same time, it can
individualize stuff so folks will then talk about their angle
on oppression and get on a soapbox around that, and then aren't
open to the engaging in difference and looking at themselves,
it's more about being preachy. And I think that's a fine line
that I think you always have to walk in coalition building.
It's really hard.
Holloway:
What about the generational differences? You know, race relations
has been a problem for a long time and it looks like it still
is here, and the discussions move from different coalitions
and different groups. But what about the generational viewpoint?
Do you feel that the generation before you, your or our parents'
generation has done any good or bad to affect where we are
today?
Johnson:
I've actually thought about that, and when I was a student
at Chapel Hill I had the opportunity to have a discussion
with some students and some parents about the differences
and how people perceive change. One of the things that was
apparent to me is that older generations, especially of black
people, tend to think of things in the matter of "we had nothing,
we came from nothing, and now look how much we have access
to. This is wonderful, this is great, be happy. I didn't have
thabout what happened in so-called Jim Crow in the 20's; we're
not talking about what happened in 1865. There seems to be
no comprehension that well into the 70's segregation was alive
and well in your neighborhood, and is alive and well in 1997!
Holloway:
Well that's what I was about to bring up now, going into '98,
we've got segregation in public schools now in some instances.
Some would say that the historically black colleges still
are segregated. And then on the larger predominate campuses,
you have segregated societies in dormitories or dorm clusters
or groups.
Johnson:
What's the difference between segregation and choice, though?
I think that's something that we have to talk about.
Deifel:
Because what you were talking about is the difference between-and
Troy Duster, who's on our advisory board and who's at the
UC Berkeley, talks about the difference between access and
engagement. I mean, the 60's and 70's were about access. Now
it's about engagement, and I think young people are really-it's
at a different point. We have very popular bands, like Hootie
and the Blowfish and stuff that are integrated, and you have
people that are coming from mixed racial backgrounds fr
Holloway:
Well, that's interesting. Let's move that discussion of Affirmative
Action now, in terms of, that may have some impact on the
access or even potential for engagement if you don't have
the opportunity. California's already gone to that now. What
are your views on this whole Affirmative Action situation,
how it may could one day affect North Carolina?
Deifel:
Well based on the Ism Class, to bring you back to the Ism
Class, we very deliberately have the professors in the classes
make sure that the class is diverse, because there's just
no way you can engage difference unless it's diverse. And
so if you have the premise like Michael Dyson was talking
about in terms of dissonance and differences can really breed
learning, then you have to ensure that that's going to be
there. And at the same time, all across the 19 schools we
work with, stu
Johnson:
Well I think there has to be a tremendous amount of education
from both sides about what Affirmative Action is and what
it means. I am distressed when I see commercials, when I hear
commentary, or when I read commentary about Affirmative Action
and quotas. Quotas have not been legal in this country in
I don't know how many years, so when I'm dealing with students,
a lot of times I hear "Well, there's a quota, there's a quota,
there's a quota!" There is no quota. There are goals, the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has a goal that
they would like to represent each culture within the state
population on their campus. Black people are underrepresented
at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We make
up a good 20 to 30% of the state population, yet we only make
up between 9 and 12% of the campus population at Chapel Hill.
So it's about opportunity, it's about goals, it's about opening
doors, and also it's about the acknowledgment that America
is not a meritocracy, that people are not given opportunities
to receive higher education based upon only test scores. People
aren't given jobs only based upon their resume, only based
upon some kind of quantitative data, that someone can go,
"You're 98 and she's 97, therefore you get the job."
Holloway:
Did you receive any kind of perceived or real pressure or
influence from others that you were there because of some
of those reasons?
Johnson:
No, I've always known why I'm here. I'm here by the grace
of God, every place I go! So if someone is saying it's a low
score or a high score, they're completely missing out on their
understanding as human beings on this earth, Jay, you know?
Holloway:
We just have a couple more minutes. Let's move now to the
whole class structure, because there was some discussion about
that. That it's more than just the race thing, but there may
be some class and economic differences. Any comments either
one of you would like to make on that?
Deifel:
Well class is so invisible and one of the things we learned
with the Ism schools-like Dartmouth was one of our schools,
and in the Dartmouth class there were people that came from
middle class and lower class, but when they got to college,
they were all of a sudden able to interact and get away with
really being from a different class, and so we found that
students are less likely to engage on issues of class. And
we're still, frankly, puzzled about how to get at that. I
mean, it's
Johnson:
Tony we've been brainwashed. I mean, we live in a country
that says class does not exist, that we don't have classes,
that we're not Britain, we're not France, we're not all these
other places, and that's definitely not true. You know, opportunities
are available to some of us because of the amount of money
we own, -not the kind of money we own, but the amount of money
that we have access to and the kind of property that we own.
Holloway:
So did you find in your project that students seem to identify
more along class structures than race, or was it . . .
Johnson:
Well, I think . . .
Deifel:
We found across the 19 campuses definitely more race. And
class would come up, but it was just a harder one to get into,
much harder.
Johnson:
And when you think about it, Mr. Holloway, when you get into
a college campus, you all of a sudden have this-I wouldn't
say classless thing, the class would blend, because the people
who come in from a lower economic backgrounds, because they're
in a college setting, all of a sudden are raised up, you know,
just automatically, the simple fact that they attend college.
Now with people who are coming from upper middle class and
upper class backgrounds, I think they could sort of blend
now. That's part of hip-hop culture, that's part of popular
culture, so what you wear is no longer an indication of what
class you come from.
Holloway:
Tony, a few more seconds, you want to have the last word?
Deifel:
I guess the last thing I would say is that young people are
fairly sophisticated on this, and one of the things I see
around, I guess an ageism thing maybe, is people that are
my age and older a lot of times won't recognize-they'll talk
down to young people and they'll kind of tell them they way
it was in the Sixties and stuff like that. And young people
are really sophisticated, and if they're given the space to
really engage these issues, they might create some of the,
talk about s
Holloway:
Thank you both for being here. The time has run completely
out. And the problems facing college campuses mirror really
what's going on in society, yet it should be on these campuses
that cultural diversity and the exchanging of ideas should
thrive, creating possible examples for our greater society
to follow. After all, there institutions are supposed to be
for preparing our future leaders to go out into an ever-changing
world to work and live. So if students can leave these institutions
with new information and skills on improving race relations,
then their higher learning may be one step further to helping
all of us improve our race relations throughout North Carolina
and this country. Thank you for watching Black Issues Forum
today. Please contact us with your comments. Our telephone
number is 919-549-7167. Fax us at 919-549-7168. E-mail us
at bif@unctv.org, or visit us on the World Wide Web at www.unctv.org/bif.
You'll find more information on race relations, past episodes
and additional information on concerns and issues for African-Americans
and others.
Thank
you for watching Black Issues Forum. I'm Jay Holloway. You
have a blessed evening and a good night.
[MUSIC]
|