|
Town
Hall Meeting on Race Relations
Fayetteville State University
Fayetteville, NC
Part Two
Episode #1413
| Holloway:
|
Host,
Jay Holloway |
|
Costas: |
Maria
Costas, Chair of the Human Relations Commission and
Co-Chair of the study circle's working group |
| Graham:
|
Sherrie
Graham, Co-Chair of the study circle's working group |
| Locus:
|
Karl
Locus, concerned citizen of Fayetteville |
| Armstrong:
|
Barbara
Armstrong, audience member |
| Hill:
|
Bishop
Ken Hill, Church of God, North Ramsey, audience member |
| M: |
Male Voice |
| F:
|
Female
Voice |
Holloway:
We are in Fayetteville, North
Carolina on the campus of Fayetteville State University. Tonight
we are talking about race relations again. This is part two.
We will talk tonight about study circles, working groups.
We will tell you about it next on Black Issues Forum. [PAUSE:
MUSIC]
Holloway:
Good evening and welcome to
another edition of Black Issues Forum. I'm Jay Holloway, your
host. Tonight we are in Fayetteville on the campus of Fayetteville
State University. We're talking about race relations. This
is the town hall meeting, part two. Tonight we are talking
about an outcome of a town hall meeting that was held, actually
we had one last week but the citizens in Fayetteville had
one in April of 1998. And out of that came study groups. And
here to talk about that we have three panelists and a studio
audience as well. First, Maria Costas, she is Chair of the
Human Relations Commission and co-Chair's the study circle's
working group effort here in Fayetteville. Maria, thank you
for being with us.
Costas:
Thank you.
Holloway:
Also, Sherrie Graham, she is
also co-Chair of the study circle's working group. Sherrie,
thank you for being with us.
Graham:
Thank you, Jay.
Holloway:
And last but not least, is Karl
Locus. Karl is a concerned citizen here in Fayetteville. And
Karl, thank you for participating with us today.
Locus:
Thank you.
Holloway:
Let's talk about these study
circles working group. That is a new terminology for me and
perhaps it probably is for citizens across the state. Tell
us how this came about and what the purpose really for these
study groups are, if either of you would like to start with
that.
Graham:
Study circles are small groups
of generally 10 to 15 people who agree to meet for 4 to 6
weeks, to grapple with a social or political issue. Study
circles originated from the Study Circles Resource Center
which is in Palmfred, Connecticut. And that organization has
outlined a model that has been used around the country, actually,
for several years now. And the study circles are basically
founded in the town hall tradition with the exception that
that there is no predetermined outcome to the process. It
is an opportunity for people to dialog about that particular
issue and present their views without needing to defend their
position and then moving toward an action agenda. So, it is
two parts, dialog phase and then an action component.
Holloway:
Where are you now with that
dialog reaction phase, Maria?
Costas:
The study circles in Fayetteville
have three phases. It was the first phase that Linda and Ray
and Mr. Stancil talked about when people got together organizational
and began to talk about how we can work on race relations.
That was the first phase and then the second phase was inviting
some of the different organizations in Fayetteville to be
part of our working group. The working group is composed of...the
first members were of the Fayetteville United and the Human
Relations Commission that are the co-sponsors of the study
circle. That first phase is already in process. The second
phase is training the facilitators that will do the study
circles. In the first phase, in between we have what we call
the pilot study circles. The pilot study circles are a try
out of the study circles. And we have already gone through
that first phase. We have Fayetteville United that went through
a pilot study circle. The Human Relations Commission and part
of some groups in the community went through some pilot study
circles. Before, Linda was talking about 2 churches that came
together and they all studied in the pilot study circles,
Snyder Memorial and the First Baptist Church.
Holloway:
Now when you refer to Linda,
that was from our program last week.
Costas:
Yes.
Holloway:
Yes she said that. Let me ask
Karl, Karl you will or may participate or have participated
in some of these, but I know you probably feel that the action
stage doesn't come quick enough. Is that true?
Locus:
That is very true. My concern
is that in any organization you have accountability that is
supposed to start with top all the way down, setting the goals,
setting the vision, following through with the objectives
and having follow up. My concern is what brought us really
here today, talking with Fayetteville United, was the three
police officer situation which EEOC has ruled on. And the
unfortunate part is that gets lost in the conversation. There
should be a direct action on that issue already because it
was said during that particular period of time when the issue
was being raised in the city council, we had 5, 3 African-American,
2 white American city council members who said, "let's just
investigate," as these three officers said. And at this point
now, we have gone for months on end and haven't resolved that
issue. That issue needs to be resolved. A study circle will
not be able to resolve that issue when you have people who
are accountable in political office as well as in government
office that can resolve that problem.
Holloway:
Sherrie, did that come up in
any of the study circles? Was it an issue?
Graham:
It has come up. It has certainly
come up in the study circles, although the content of the
dialog is confidential. So, I am not privileged to share that
with you, but I can assure you that it is a hot topic. It
is expected to be addressed in the community-wide study circle
process. I think something productive will come from that
dialog, but I agree that is not the actual forum of resolution.
I don't think that is the expectation, but it is a functional
part of the healing process for this community regarding that
issue as well as others.
Holloway:
You can understand, probably,
why some people would think that especially when you say that
the process is confidential, that maybe this process is not
going to really resolve the issue. But just for discussion,
where do you see this resolution coming? I guess that is what
I am saying, and is the study circle a forum for it?
Graham:
Jay, are you referring to the
resolution of race relations or that particular incident?
Holloway:
I guess that particular incident.
Or other issues of that kind.
Graham:
Again, I think that some healing
will take place in the course of dialog because there are
lots of different emotions in the community right now regarding
that issue. And coming together to dialog and to work toward
an action agenda of ways that we can work together, ways that
we can hopefully prevent similar situations from occurring
in the future.
Holloway:
Will some of these general findings
be made public even though you mentioned that some of the
discussions, you mean the persons making the points is confidential.
Graham:
Absolutely, absolutely. But
the points that have been discussed, the action recommendations
will certainly become public. The plan is that an action forum
will take place in May at the conclusion of the round of study
circles, the community wide ...
Holloway:
May of 1999?
Graham:
Yes, May of 1999. The community-wide
study circles will occur between January and April. The action
forum is a public presentation of the recommendations to the
elected officials, to the citizens, to the community at-large.
Holloway:
Let me just say to our citizens
watching and whether you are in Fayetteville or around the
state, we are going to give you the number to these study
circles and you can find out more about how the citizens here
in Fayetteville are doing that. And we will give you that
number at the end of the program. Let's go to our studio audience
right now. We have a comment or question ma'am? Go right ahead.
Armstrong:
Yes, my name is Barbara Armstrong,
and I am a resident of Fayetteville. A number of issues come
to mind when we talk about study circles because one of the
largest issues that comes to my mind sitting down here is,
it is very easy to dialog with people that understand and
have the time for meetings and so forth. But, one of the major
problems that we have in this community with the rip, the
rupture that has happened with several incidences in this
community, is that we are not addressing people who are working
class or are everyday folks that have on top of possible racial
issues, they have economic demands upon them and their families.
There are a lot of problems here that extend beyond the race
thing, but the race thing is a part of it. And, I would like
to know how the study circles are going to attempt to reach
into that area because certainly the people who drove down
and killed the couple off of Wilmington Road would not come
and sit down at a study circle and try to resolve those issues.
You know?
Holloway:
Good point. How are we going
to take care of that? Let me say that Karl Locus, when he
heard about us coming here, contacted us and engaged himself
in this issue and said you know, "I want to talk to you all
about this," because he raised some of the similar issues.
You might want to talk about that from the citizen's point
of view first, and then I would like to ask the study circles,
how are you engaging persons like that? Because you are not
representing a specific organization, you are a concerned
citizen and you have some of the same concerns that she has.
Locus:
Very same concerns. And my concern
is simply this, when you are elected to an office then you
have the accountability not waiting for a circle group to
come up with a conclusion that is already held by law, by
public policy, held by EEOC policies and laws. So, why are
we waiting for a circle group to tell us what the law is already
saying? We need to enforce it. So either if you are in industry
as an official or whether you are in government as an official
or any other kind of business, you should be acting on that,
not waiting for a study circle or study group to look at it.
It is nice to have to have dialog. That is good and people
feel good about that. But, the action part of it. My question
would be what is the healing for the three officers and a
fourth that was added by EEOC. What is the healing process
for them in terms of a remedy? That is what they are looking
for. I am sure they will probably attend some of the study
circles, but the first and foremost thing we are saying is
that the major issue is that we felt we were unjustly treated.
And then we went through the process, wound up with EEOC and
had a finding saying 'yes, that happened'. So what is the
healing process for them? How come we haven't acted on that?
We don't need a study circle to examine that issue. I understand
that some of it is going to be confidential because I understand
there are going to be legal questions they have to deal with,
but at the same token, what is the actual remedy for those
individuals? That is where the real healing needs to start
at, just like for Michael James and Jackie Burton. Their families
would like to see what would be the process to make sure that
we eliminate any kind of Klan, Nazi, or skinhead activity
in our community because those guys didn't pop up out of the
wood work. What are we doing with our sheriff's department,
our military policing, our local police. What kind of things
are we doing there to make sure that doesn't happen again?
Also, when we see hiring practice problems. It was covered
well when we had a situation where a principal applied for
a position with a PhD and was not given an opportunity. A
lesser qualified person was given the job with a Master's
Degree. So we are looking for concrete things that will make
those things be resolved, not just discussion. Discussion
is good. We have been discussing things since Dr. King died,
but what are we doing now? We have got to get to some concrete
actions especially when you are in office and you have the
range of policies within your organization which ever kind
it is, to say what you are supposed to do as well as those
laws that we founded our constitution.
Holloway:
Let me just ask our co-chairs
to respond to that because I guess there has to be some relationship
to the study circles and those who are actually accountable.
You all are encouraging and with the help of another organization,
I guess, forming this dialog, but you all are not necessarily
held accountable for resolving those issues are you?
Graham:
No, not at all and I feel the
need to perhaps make a point of clarification. Just from a
personal point of view because while I am the co-chair of
the study circle's project, I am employed by Louis Chappell,
Missionary Baptist Church, as the director of special projects.
And it is not my understanding that the study circles have
any, any study circles program has any obligation or authority
to deal with the legal, the resolution of these legal matters.
I think that they are quite separate. I understand that they
are related, but the study circle's focus is to improve race
relations. Clearly, this issue involves race relations and
hopefully it will be positively influenced or the community
focus will be positively influenced through study circles,
but not resolved from a legal point of view.
Holloway:
You have something to add to
that?
Costas:
Yeah. Adding to that, this is
a personnel issue more than a community issue. Yes, it is
has some percussions in terms of race relations, but right
now it is a legal issue. And when you go through a legal issue,
it usually takes time. We are not a part of that legal issue.
As a volunteer for the Human Relations Commission and being
the Chair of the Human Relations Commission, the Human Relations
Commission as a whole has to made sure to send a letter to
the city officers to tell them that we want this issue to
be resolved. That we are here to help in any way that we can,
but we are not accountable to whatever resolution they have.
We are willing to work on resolution and healing process,
but as you know, a personnel issue is confidential. I don't
want my personnel issues to be all around town. That is the
difference between what we are doing and what is happening
with the police department issue. I think that there are two
different issues, but at the same time they are interrelated.
Holloway:
Let's go to the audience again.
We have another comment or question? Sir, go right ahead.
Hill:
Hi, I am Bishop Ken Hill from
Church of God, North Ramsey. There is a sleeping giant out
there that I wonder if the study circle is considering. And
that is that we all fail the work force. We know as welfare
is today and in a few more years, will be no more. One of
the questions that I have, is there an ongoing study towards
training the non-working force here in Fayetteville who are
on welfare? And pretty soon their welfare will not be that
way any longer. Are there training programs in place to make
these people marketable for jobs becoming available and the
awareness of those jobs so that people will be prepared for
those jobs and for training for those jobs.
Holloway:
So we are back to these two
issues. Some specific action that people can do versus the
discussion and sensitivity. So we have got two issues I guess.
Who wants to deal with that first? Locas: One, what we just
finished talking about because I think that is one of the
concerns that I have. When I went to the first panel we basically
came together because of the police officer situation as well
as the murders, as well as the issue when we had the petition
about this principal who wasn't given a job but earned PhD.
That is what the black community was really responding to,
but then we came to that meeting. My concern was what is it
going to be diluted to what we're talking about now, where
there is no accountability within the circles when we are
talking about healing. To me, if I'm cut, you can't talk about
me being cut and healing. These police officers were the ones
that were cut. They need to be healed. And that is what my
concern is. Not that we shouldn't dialogue, we should always
dialogue. Dr. King always said "dialogue." But he also said
direct action and then results out of that action. And I think
that is where we have to move to that next phase. In terms
of welfare training, I think there has been a concern of passage
across the nation that some of this is going to be dropped
on the churches to try to do. And again, their concern that
they are already overwhelmed with trying to meet the needs,
but how can they also pull up and galvanize other resources
to meet those needs. And so again, that goes back to there
does need to be a compassionate side of the church being involved.
But there also needs to be a governmental role making sure
there is a smooth transition, benefits and training and those
things.
Holloway:
Let me ask our co-chair to respond
to his comment too, and if you could do it briefly, we've
got two other comments at the microphone.
Graham:
One of the points I'd like to
lift here again is that while the study circles program cannot
resolve, literally, these issues legally or perhaps even programmatically,
it is a forum, an excellent forum, for people to come out
and voice their opinions, voice their concerns and make action
recommendations so that when we move to the action phase,
again the action phase that is presented to the city officials,
that is presented to the community at large which will hopefully
develop task forces and other means, a court watch, for example,
has even been proposed. Perhaps then we can make progress
on these issues of concern. So, I think it is a step in the
right direction. I think there is a genuine opportunity for
action to flow.
Holloway:
I think I'm glad you said it
because, really, that is the purpose of this program as well.
We can't resolve it, but we can get people having dialogue.
Speaking of dialogue we have a comment or question, go right
ahead, sir.
M:
My name is ______ East and I'm
a student here at Fayetteville State University and I wanted
to ask if the study circles deals with issues concerning today's
youth, especially the youth who grows up in a bad family structure
or "bad neighborhood?"
Holloway:
That was brought up before.
Costas:
One of the things that we are
trying to do is involve all people across lines in the community.
It can be youth, elderly, Hispanic, Asian. We have invited
everyone that wants to participate to come. As a matter of
fact, 750 letters went out several weeks ago to the different
organizations including churches, organizations that include
youth and include all kinds of races and economical backgrounds
and we are already beginning to receive the responses to the
human relations staff.
Holloway:
And let me say, we will put
that number up on the screen again for youth, if you have
not been contacted we'll let you know that number at the end.
We have another comment or question. Go right ahead, sir.
M:
Yeah, I'm Tom Hennessy, a teacher
at Fayetteville State University. I've also been a member
of the human relations commission for about four years now.
I want to address a couple of things. I think one of the things,
I appreciate Mr. Locas' concerns, but I think one of the things
that came out of the original issues was the failure of different
parts of the community to hear the concerns that the African
American community was raising in regard to those police officers.
And I think that is one of the things that the study circles
can do is begin to make it possible for people to hear each
other's concerns. Perhaps earlier than happened in that particular
event. And again, one of the things, the human relations commissions
began talking about the study circles almost two years ago
under Sandy Schweitzer's leadership and that is one of the
things we were addressing is how to get the community to listen
to each other. And again, I think one of the things that,
both reaching out to youth and one of the things that we want
to try to do in the study circles is to get people to understand
where they came from and how that impacts on the life that
they live. And I think in that reality older people communicating
with younger people, understanding how things have changed
over time, or how they haven't changed over time. I think
the point that was made in the earlier program by Dr. Brown
that over the 40 years that he has been in this community
he has seen a significant amount of change. Mr. East has only
been alive for 22 years, obviously he hasn't seen the same
change. But making that kind of awareness is what an intergenerational
communication can help to address.
Holloway:
Thank you for your comments.
Karl, you, how do you respond to that?
Locus:
I agree. One, I think youth
should talk to their elders. It is very important. You should
talk to not just elders in your family but other elders, that
is always important to get as much information as you possibly
can that would help you in terms of growing and life. However,
I think that one of the things that we have a responsibility
as adults to do is to make sure that 30 years from now we
haven't seen what I call the smoke and mirrors, but really
know change. And I believe that as you look at what we have
heard in the previous program when we talked about economic
development, we can see some of the same systemic problems
in terms of hiring as well.
Holloway:
Let me get two brief comments
in then we are going to go Dr. Brown in just a second. Ma'am,
go ahead.
F:
Quick question. I'm Mary Holmes,
Executive Director of Cumberland Community Foundation here
in Fayetteville and I understand that the, Cumberland County
has one of the largest Latino populations in North Carolina,
if not the largest, depending on how the measure is taken.
Will the study circle program reach out to more than the African
American and Caucasian community, will it include a broader
group or will it focus on....
Holloway:
Wait, before we get to that,
let me ask the next question and I want you to respond about
the Latino community being involved. And we will get to that.
Can I have the next question or comment, sir, and then we
are going to have Dr. Brown come up because we are about to
wrap up.
M:
My name is Joseph Johnson. I'm
the Dean of School of Education here at Fayetteville State.
My question and issue is one of sustained ability. And I understand
that this study circle project will end in April, they are
going to have an action. But will there be a sustainability
of the dialogue. After this is over.
Holloway:
Let's address those real quickly.
The Latino community and then the sustainability. Sherrie,
if you can take that.
Graham:
In spite of the initiative to
include all kinds of races, because we have a large Latino
community in Fayetteville, but we also have Asian and other
racial background people in this community, we have included
several organizations from the Latino community, the Asian
community. We have invited the Indian community. All kinds
of races and in the pilot study circles we have several members
of that has been pilot study circles that you have Latinos,
you have Asians. You have Greeks in that pilot study circle,
Indian. All kinds.
Holloway:
That's great, so it is very
diverse. Time has really run out and we are going to give
you a number and you can find out more about the sustainability
of these things. But, let's go to Dr. Brown who is the former
Associate Superintendent of Public Instruction here in Fayetteville
for some concluding comments. Brown: Thank you, Mr. Holloway.
May I say that I'd like to leave in conjunction with this
segment three words that are very important in life, and Mr.
Locas, were Martin Luther King living he and I would be the
same age, so I thought a long time as he has thought a long
time. And I have learned that there is nothing any more valuable
to us than quality communication. And I applaud the people
who started this communication too. It is not an end within
itself but it is a beginning and may I say that the three
words, attitude, study circle people, behavior and consequences.
We are usually at the bottom dealing with the consequences
that we don't like. What happened, what happened, we don't
like. But the step above that is behavior. The behavior begot
the consequences that we don't like. But that is basically
where we find ourselves running in circles, dealing with behavior,
behavior, behavior, not realizing that behavior is a product
of attitude. And I hope that the circle and all other groups
that will tend to work with race relations will start with
attitude, the proper attitude, will get the proper behavior,
the proper behavior will get the proper consequences and we
will all be happier. Thank you very much.
Holloway:
Our time is completely up now
and we certainly want to thank you so much for joining us.
And please remember Dr. Brown's ABC's, examine your attitude,
look at your behavior and consider the consequences. If you'd
like to find out more about the study circles here in Fayetteville,
North Carolina call this number on your screen, (910) 433-1696
or you may fax them at (910) 433-1763. Also contact us at
Black Issues Forum more about these issues and others. Visit
us on the Worldwide Web and join us next week for another
town hall meeting in Charlotte. I'm Jay Holloway, you have
a blessed evening and a good night.
|